Wednesday, November 6, 2019

Scorsese, Coppola – not the only ones who call Marvel’s comic book installments “despicable” – “theme park” movies

Poor Martin Scorsese.

The long time veteran filmmaker and Oscar winning director of such classic crime dramas as Taxi Driver (1976), Goodfellas (1991) and Casino (1995) was only expressing his opinion of Disney’s Marvel franchise when he called them “theme-park” films which in turn drew backlash from the “Hollyweird” elite.

“I don’t see them. I tried, you know? But that’s not cinema,” Scorsese told Empire magazine in the 10/4/19 issue while promoting his latest three-hour-plus gangster epic, The Irishman (2019) scheduled to premiere on Netflix Nov. 27 starring Robert De Niro, Joe Pesci and Al Pacino. “Honestly, the closest I can think of them, as well made as they are, with actors doing the best they can under the circumstances, is theme parks. It isn’t the cinema of human beings trying to convey emotional, psychological experiences to another human being.”


The damning comments were followed by another veteran filmmaking legend and Oscar winner, Francis Ford Coppola (The Godfather trilogy – 1972-1990), who at a press conference in Lyon, France clarified Scoresese’s.

“When Martin Scorsese says that the Marvel pictures are not cinema, he’s right because we expect to learn something from cinema, we expect to gain something, some enlightenment, some knowledge, some inspiration,” and, “Martin was kind when he said it’s not cinema. He didn’t say it’s despicable, which I just say it is,” Coppola remarked.

A year before actor Ethan Hawke expressed his dismay with Marvel’s Logan (2017) in a Film Stage interview.

“Now we have the problem that they tell us ‘Logan’ is a great movie. Well, it’s a great superhero movie. It still involves people in tights with metal coming out of their hands. It’s not Bresson. It’s not Bergman. But they talk about it like it is,” Hawke said. “I went to see ‘Logan’ ‘cause everyone was like, ‘This is a great movie’ and I was like, ‘Really? No, this is a fine superhero movie.’ There’s a difference, but big business doesn’t think there’s a difference. Big business wants you to think that this is a great film because they wanna make money off of it.”


“These two guys (Scorsese and Coppola) are my heroes, and they have earned the right to express their opinions,” director Jon Favreau (The Lion King – 2019) told CNBC. “I wouldn't be doing what I'm doing if they didn’t carve the way. They served as a source of inspiration, you can go all the way back to Swingers.... They can express whatever opinion they like.”
The past few years I’ve avoided seeing several Marvel movies. The fact Mickey Mouse churns out two to three films a year is not the result of my suffering from Marvel fatigue. My reasons stem from finding them predictable, emotionally empty and nothing but a meaningless money marketing excuse to sell overpriced $200 plus action figures. For me, the Marvel villains fade from memory within a few minutes whereas the ones from the DC universe (Lex Luthor, General Zod, Bane, the Joker, Catwoman, Harley Quinn, etc) make lasting impressions.

Every time a character from the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) mentions some cataclysmic alien event that happened in a previous installment, I keep expecting a comment at the bottom of the screen saying, “For reference see Avengers: Age of Ultron (2015)” which is exactly what the monthly Marvel comics do.

The powers-that-be at Mickey Mouse will have you believe that EVERYTHING they’ve given audiences is gold but the truth is Marvel’s billion dollar franchise is as flawed as every other movie franchise since the James Bond films of the 1960s. The majority of the MCU films I’ve seen the past few years were not gems and the couple movies I did like were not glowing recommendations.
Doctor Strange (2016) was the worst of them - an overdosed LSD acid trip using magic whose screenplay was a rush job as a means to keep up with Marvel’s release schedule, especially since the lead character played by Benedict Cumberbatch was slated to appear in other future MCU installments. Add to that writer/director Scott Derrickson’s decision to not use an Asian actor as a sorcerer mentor and instead casting Tilda Swinton in the role as a means to avoid negative racial stereotypes was just another example of Disney’s attempt at political correctness.

While the storyline for Thor: Ragnarok (2017) made no sense, it did have Cate Blanchett as the villainess who stole the show, which made the two hours spent watching the film tolerable.

As for Black Panther (2018), I still can’t get through it without dozing off during the first half hour.

Avengers: Infinity War (
2018) was a comic book nerd’s wet dream – a chance for “The Big Bang Theory” crowd to get their rocks off seeing every superhero in MCU land come together to battle a supervillain from a “galaxy far, far away” who, after wiping everyone out on Earth, just wanted to be left alone. Just because a majority of the superheroes were killed didn’t mean we would never see them again. To quote Howard Beale, the Mad Prophet of the Airwaves, played by Peter Finch in Network (1976), “We'll tell you anything you want to hear… and no matter how much trouble the hero is in, don't worry, just look at your watch; at the end of the hour he's going to win. We'll tell you any shit you want to hear.” Thus, no payoff.

The Blockbuster Video references in Captain Marvel (2019) was the only reason I went to see it, since I worked for the company from 1988-2008. Like Black Panther, which was made to be an inspiration to African-Americans, Captain Marvel was made to appeal to young girls who dream of being superheroines. Trouble is there is already a female superhero young girls can relate to and her name is Wonder Woman.

Avengers: Endgame (2019) won me over because it actually had an emotional payoff – two of the lead superheroes died.

I can just see as a result of what I’ve just blogged the comments coming from “Nerdville” who after reading this will be similar to what Spider-man: In the Spider-verse (2018) director Peter Ramsey said about Scorsese’s telling me, “Marvel movies are fun and good. Chill.”

"I think that Marvel films are so popular because they're really entertaining and people desire entertainment when they have their special time after work, after dealing with their hardships in real life," Thor star Natalie Portman said on comicbook.com.

“My feeling is, Martin Scorsese never sat in a movie theater with his dad and watched the movies of Steven Spielberg in the early '80s or George Lucas in the late '70s,” added director/actor Kevin Smith. "He didn't feel that sense of magic and wonder. I can still step into one of those comic book movies, divorce myself of that fact that I do this for a living, release, and my dead dad is back for a minute, for two hours. And it's personal for a lot of the audience. You know, and we're not arguing whether or not it counts as cinema. I guarantee you there's something he enjoyed with his parents, like a musical — I bet you some cats would say, 'A musical is not really cinema,' but Martin Scorsese grew up on musicals, and I bet they mean a lot to him. These [Marvel] movies come from a core. They come from a happy childhood. And they're reflections of a happy childhood. He's not wrong, but at the same time, neither are we for loving those movies. And they are cinema."

Disney CEO Bob Iger offered what would seem to be the last word concerning Scorsese’s and Coppola’s criticisms in a conversation with Wall Street Journal Editor-in-Chief, Matt Murray, during a WSJ Tech Live talk last month.

“I reserve the word ‘despicable’ for someone who committed mass murder. I don’t get what they’re trying to criticize us for when we are making films that people obviously are enjoying. I’m puzzled by it. If they want to bitch about movies, it’s certainly their right,” Iger said. “It seems so disrespectful to all the people that work on those [Marvel] films who are working just as hard as the people who work on their films. … Are you telling me Ryan Coogler making ‘Black Panther’ is somehow doing something that is less than what Marty Scorsese or Francis Ford Coppola has ever done on any one of their movies?”
I’m as much for enjoying a mindless “popcorn” movie every now and then as the next person as a means to get away from all the daily political nonsense, mass shootings and depressing news reported every day. Trouble is the Marvel movies fall below that. The majority of them are all style and almost zero substance. They are not “event” movies, something to look forward to, which is what I call the DC Comics/Warner Brothers franchise. 
DC learned early on after the box office failure of Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016) that they cannot follow the same format tying every superhero movie to the previous one let alone release more than two movies a year the way Disney continues to do. The difference is unlike Marvel’s installments, the number of DC’s movies I’ve embraced are more than the ones I didn’t (Suicide Squad – 2016, Aquaman – 2018).

In the end, what two film making legends think of an unstoppable billion dollar toy making comic book movie franchise is nothing more than an opinion. As I've said so many times before, if one doesn't like it, don't watch it. Scorsese and Coppola were only sharing their views on Marvel movies and while the argument can be made as to how much they are wrong, based on the MCU installments I’ve sat through, truth be damned, they are actually right.

©11/6/19

Wednesday, June 5, 2019

“The Last Op-ed-Blogger”…a Darth Stumpo original song…ok…not really but it could be

One of the many dangers in hosting an opinion blog is the risk that my viewpoint is going to offend some people though nine times out of ten…no, ten times out of ten, I didn’t intend for it to happen that way. In my opinion, that reader, or readers, took what I wrote out of context.

I’ve accepted what I will blog about in the future, as well as what I’ve written in the past, that not everyone is going to agree with my opinions. The problem is some, not all, are clueless as to what an opinion is. So much so that they take what I wrote or said personally and declare a “jihad” against me by deleting me from their social media contact lists, stupidly thinking their misguided “holy war” is going to keep me up at night. (I actually sleep pretty well, if not better, especially knowing they removed me from existence on their social media accounts). Last time I checked America is still a free country and so long as I’m not breaking any laws, I can write whatever the hell I want.

I am not going to offer justification to what I blogged about so readers understand the “method in my madness” as to where I was coming from when I wrote it. Nor will I waste words explaining what an op-ed blog is or apologize if what I write causes backlash.
That being said I’ve been listening to a lot of songs on my iPhone over the past month. Though I’ve heard them many times before this was the first time, I had found that some of those tunes actually described me, like as though the songwriter had me in mind when they wrote it. I found that one of those hits, a song by Tom Petty and the Heartbreakers, called "The Last DJ" from 2002, applies to this week’s blog. I took the liberty of changing some of that song’s lyrics applying them to myself when it comes to blogging. So here is my rendition titled, "The Last Op-Ed Blogger". Feel free to sing along if you like!

The Last Op-ed Blogger


Well you can't turn Joe into a company man
You can't turn Joe into a whore
And his biased liberal friends want nothing to do with him anymore
Well the Fakebook world don't like him blogging so much
And he won't write what they say to write
And he don't want to change what don't need to change

And there goes the last op-ed blogger
Who blogs what he wants to blog
And writes what he wants to say
Hey, hey, hey
And there goes your freedom of choice
There goes the last written voice
There goes the last op-ed blogger

Well some liberals say they're gonna hang Joe so high
Because you just can't blog what he blogged
There's just some things you can't pound into 'dem die-hard socialist kids
As Democrats and Hollyweird celebrate hypocrisy all 'dem liberals just want to see
Only blogs that bash the conservative hard right for free
 
And there goes the last op-ed blogger
Who blogs what he wants to blog
And writes what he wants to say
Hey, hey, hey
And there goes your freedom of choice
There goes the last written voice
And there goes the last op-ed blogger
 
Well he got himself a blog named Darth Stumpo
And when time allows he’ll publish something new
And he’ll bust a move and remember how it was back then
There goes the last op-ed blogger
Who blogs what he wants to blog
And writes what he wants to say
Hey, hey, hey
And there goes your freedom of choice
There goes the last written voice
And there goes the last op-ed blogger

©6/5/19

Wednesday, January 9, 2019

Just another awards night bashing conservatives



I was not surprised by actor Christian Bale’s acceptance speech at the Golden Globes Jan. 6 in which he thanks “Satan” for his unflattering portrayal of former Vice President Dick Cheney (2001-2009) in "Vice" (2018). I would have suffered a massive heart attack or a debilitating stroke if the awards night had been completely free of any conservative bashing one-sided liberal politics. Rest assured, you wouldn’t be reading this blog if that had occurred as I would have drifted off this mortal coil into the netherworld somewhere between Heaven and Hell. If I was lucky, I’d most likely be in Purgatory.

Bale’s comment is the latest display of bile spewed by the “Hollyweird” left wing elite against conservatives and President Donald Trump. They include, among them, Robert De Niro’s “Fuck Trump” speech at the Tony Awards, Johnny Depp’s assassinating Trump comment for which he later apologized, and comedian Kathy Griffin holding a bloody severed head of Trump in a photo. If Hollywood conservatives made such comments against President Barack Obama during his presidency (2008-2016), would they have gotten away with saying such remarks, or at the very least, receive a slap on the wrist? That’s like saying if a diabetic patient skips their daily insulin injections for a month, they’ll still be able to physically function as their blood sugar numbers climb over 1000.



It’s bad enough I am bored by 99 percent of all the sequels (Star Wars not withstanding), comic book-franchise movies and needless remakes (I DON’T WANT TO SEE A REMAKE OF "WEST SIDE STORY" (1961), MR. SPIELBERG!!!!)

Hollyweird’s negative political opinions is the reason why I only saw five movies at the box office in 2018 and only two of them, I liked. Such is also the reason why I avoid watching the Oscars because I can no longer stomach the personal politics of the nominees and winners in their acceptance speeches. (Don’t even get me started on the “Black Oscars Matter/Minority Actors Matter Movements)!!!!


If anything positive has come out of Hollyweird’s continuing “I hate Donald Trump or any Republican congressional leader” campaign, it is that documentary filmmaker, Michael Moore, failed to repeat the same controversial box office success with his release last September of "Fahrenheit 11/9" (2018). His latest film went after President Trump much the way he targeted President George W. Bush in "Fahrenheit 9/11" (2004). Things were different in 2004, however, when that film came out. The Internet was still in its infancy and social media was not around as-yet. The no weapons of mass destruction debate with Gulf War II along with 9/11 was still fresh on Americans minds.

If Moore wants to blame anyone for his latest debacle that audiences stayed away from, perhaps he should blame the drive-by media. After all, the drive-by media are, since Trump’s 2016 election, who have been inundating viewers with their endless 24/7 “I hate Trump” coverage.

Radio talk show host and conservative pundit Rush Limbaugh nailed it on why Moore’s film flopped last September.



“Here’s the problem with Moore. He goes out there, produces this anti-Trump movie, and he forgets that audiences don’t have to pay any money to see it. All they have to do is turn on CNN! All they have to do is turn on PMSNBC,” Limbaugh said on his show Sept. 28. “All they have to do is read the Washington Post, the New York Times. Why go to a movie, and why pay whatever it costs to go see a movie where you can see the same thing every night, every day over and over again for absolutely zilch?”

The bottom line is audiences don’t want to see politics in movies and awards shows. They go see movies in hopes of getting away from that. They don’t want to see it posted on their Facebook pages on social media. They don’t want to hear about it from family members during the holidays at the dinner table. They don’t want to see spoiled; overpaid NFL football players take a knee during the Star-Spangled Banner to protest police brutality towards African Americans.
You want proof of this, look no further than the tweets people posted under #CMAAwards about the Country Music Awards last November, hosted by singers Brad Paisley and Carrie Underwood, which was free of any political commentary.

“The #CMAAwards are proving that you can have an awards show be a success without politics. It’s the ONLY award show I’ve watched all year and I’m so grateful it’s focused on celebrating great music and musicians. A big THANK YOU” wrote a woman named Melanie.

“Just people Comin together celebrating good music. No word of politics, no agendas being pushed, just strictly entertainment” wrote another named Loveee.

If audiences have a love for “Hollyweird’s politics” why then did the 2018 Oscars have the worst viewership with a decline of 20 percent over the 2017 telecast? Don’t tell me viewers tuned out only because they were not interested in any of the movies nominated. By comparison, viewership for this year’s Golden Globes was also down with 18 million viewers over the 19 million in 2018.

I’d like to think the “Hollyweird Elite” will finally get it that audiences don’t want to see politics mixed in with their entertainment. That notion, however, is nothing more than an impotent male’s hope for a wet dream; much like the same kind of wet dream Nancy Pelosi spoke of on Jan. 2.

Upon her being elected again as Speaker of the House of Representatives when congress convened, Pelosi commented how the Democratic Party will be "transparent, bipartisan and unifying", and will "seek to reach across the aisle in this chamber and across the divisions in this great nation."

That statement, which overflowed with hypocrisy, lasted about twelve hours.

©1/9/19