PG-13, 150m. 2009
Cast & Credits: Shia LaBeouf (Sam Witwicky), Megan Fox (Mikaela Banes), Josh Duhamel (Major Lennox), Tyrese Gibson (USAF Master Sergeant Epps), John Turturro (Agent Simmons), Ramon Rodriguez (Leo Spitz), Kevin Dunn (Ron Witwicky), Julie White (Judy Witwicky), Isabel Lucas (Alice). Written by Ehren Kruger, Roberto Orci, and Alex Kurtzman. Directed by Michael Bay.
I will not be surprised if "Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen" goes down as the number one worst reviewed film of 2009. The film deserves the honor, so much so that I actually hope it gets nominated for several Golden Raspberry Awards at next year’s Razzies and wins.
The film is critic proof and wasn’t made for movie critics. The picture was made for dumb, slow-witted audiences who have no sense of adventure and imagination, and for kids whose idea of adventure is to watch a lot of things get blown up.
For 150 minutes, I sat there waiting for something interesting, if not exciting to happen, and I got nothing. Such a testament will not sit well with those who saw "Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen" opening weekend bringing in over $200 million to date. I just know they will all argue and tell me a lot happened over those grueling two and a half hours where a bunch of good and bad robots fought like a couple of slow-moving overweight sumo wrestlers. In the middle of it all are plenty of sound and visual effects loud enough there was no way I could possibly get in a twenty-minute nap.
Like 2007’s box office hit, "Transformers," once again I had a hard time figuring out which robots were good and evil. The only thing I could discern is that the good robots (all right kiddies-I’ll call them by their politically correct names because you are, after all, the ones who play with these things-Autobots) lead by Optimus Prime have bright colors (blue, red, yellow, purple, and green) with eyes that are the equivalent of blue light bulbs. The bad robots, called the Decepticons, are all grey with red lights for eyes.
The Autobots disguise themselves as various sports cars and 18-wheelers. The Decepticons arrive on Earth as giant meteors smashing into and sinking aircraft carriers and submarines before turning into mechanical prehistoric four-legged monsters or fighter jets.
When it comes to the cuteness factor, an Autobot named “Bumblebee” who disguises himself as a yellow Camaro and friend to Sam Witwicky (Shia LeBeouf) provides the film’s humor using quotes from movies and playing clips of songs as a means of communication. The thing even has feelings. In an early scene when Sam tells Bumblebee he won’t be taking him to college, the Autobot spews out what I assume is green anti-freeze for tears.
Then there are a couple of jive-talking robots named Skids and Mudflap disguised as a couple of red and green Chevy compact hatchbacks who bicker and fight with each other and admit they don’t know how to read.
If there is one thing positive, I can say about the film’s predecessor is that I don’t recall "Transformers" being as vulgar when it comes to foul language and sexual innuendos. When there is no chaos and mayhem going on, there are scenes of bathroom humor that take place at the Air and Space Museum, which got grins from everyone else in the audience but me. They did the same when John Turturro’s ousted government agent character drops his pants revealing a white thong. When Witwicky’s girlfriend Mikaela (Megan Fox) and his college roommate (Ramon Rodriguez) get transported to Egypt where the final battle between the Decepticons and Autobots takes place, we see Mikaela lying face down on the roommate’s private parts.
This brings me to the subject of the entire cast itself, all of whom are reduced to nothing more than talking props. Their jobs are simple. LeBeouf’s parents (Kevin Dunn and Julie White) are required to run for their lives when the robots start fighting. The armed forces, led by Josh Duhamel of NBC’s "Las Vegas" (2003-2008), are required to offer cover for the Autobots. LeBeouf’s Witwicky is required to do a lot of running for his life and trying to figure out why the Decepticons want what is inside his brain, some knowledge about alien symbols.
Finally, Megan Fox’s job is to offer drooling males, and females and young kiddies who have yet to be told by their parents about the birds and the bees, sexy shots of her in tight jeans shorts and boots, as she paints emblems on motorcycles. She is the film’s offering of soft-core pornographic eye candy minus the nudity; a slice of feminine cheesecake to go with that hefty dish of expensive visual effects.
Fox gets every opportunity to show off her feminine sexuality. At one point dressed in a leather outfit, she strips down to an above the knee dress and some white pumps. In another scene, Fox shows off a dominatrix side treating a little Transformer like it's her pet dog yanking it on a chain who instead of using a whip, threatens to put the robot’s other electronic eye out with a blow torch. When the little Transformer develops an attachment to her, it starts humping her leg.
As I browse over the past few paragraphs of this review, I have noticed I forgot to tell you about the plot. Well, that’s because there isn’t much of one, at least not one I can make sense of anyway. I know the Decepticons want revenge and want what’s inside of LeBeouf’s brain to use his knowledge to take over the world. I know the Autobots led by Optimus Prime need to stop them, which takes the cast to the pyramids of Egypt where the final battle takes place.
I have no idea what it is the Decepticons are so pissed off about. I don’t know why in order to win a battle against a Decepticon the Autobot must be a “Prime.” I can only assume such questions are answered in the animated television series from decades ago I never watched or the short-lived comic book series from Marvel I never read. I have never played with, much less owned a toy Transformer in my life. I don’t even buy the Star Wars Transformers and I still, to a certain extent, collect Star Wars toys.
"Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen" is a sad testament of how dumbed down audiences have gotten today. Audiences apparently don’t want a movie full of engaging characters or a good story like "Star Trek" (2009), for example, which exhibited a sense of adventure, even if the space battles felt as though the filmmakers were channeling the Star Wars movies.
The film is a true waste of celluloid junk movie making and deserves a rating far lower than the NO STARS rating I have given it. How I wish there was a lower rating I can give this movie the way my seventh-grade teacher thought up a new letter grade to give failing students that was lower than an F called an F+ or F-. Up until today, I never thought it was possible for director Michael Bay and producer Jerry Bruckheimer to score making a movie as bad as their previous collaboration, "Bad Boys II" (2003), which sadly went on to gross $140 million.
I now stand corrected.
©6/29/09
